Wow, that did not have the intended effect at all.
The point being, if you can't claim that your god is at least at that minimum standard of fairness and goodness, fuck the fuck off with your shit beliefs. If they're not as good as that, they're not good at all. Anything less than that is an unworthy god. Period.
I'm not sure if that came across. That's all I was getting at. You want to claim a god is good, let alone ultimately good, you have to paint at least that good of a picture. No one has ever been able to do that. So if you're not offering that or better, stop trying to make claims about ultimate this or best that, you ain't shit and your god ain't shit. I just invented one better than yours, how's that for ultimate?
The point being, if you can't claim that your god is at least at that minimum standard of fairness and goodness, fuck the fuck off with your shit beliefs. If they're not as good as that, they're not good at all. Anything less than that is an unworthy god. Period.
I'm not sure if that came across. That's all I was getting at. You want to claim a god is good, let alone ultimately good, you have to paint at least that good of a picture. No one has ever been able to do that. So if you're not offering that or better, stop trying to make claims about ultimate this or best that, you ain't shit and your god ain't shit. I just invented one better than yours, how's that for ultimate?
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
