(July 1, 2017 at 12:23 pm)Lek Wrote:(July 1, 2017 at 6:41 am)Jehanne Wrote: It's much, much more than that. If the Hebrews were in Egypt, then there would be some archeological evidence of that, and, indeed, there is none, an untenable proposition, as there should have been some artifacts from just outside of Egypt, from the Hebrews leaving. Again, find me a scholar who takes the Exodus story at face value who is not also a Biblical inerrantist (an absurd position equivalent to Holocaust denial), and post their findings and/or reasons here. All the evidence is that the Biblical narratives were written much later than was traditionally believed and underwent layers upon layers of redaction and modification up until and even beyond the 1st century of the common era.
I believe the Dead Sea Scrolls would refute this.
The earliest tangible evidence for your silly bible are fragments of the Septuagint. It was written in Greek. The significance of the DSS is that, among Aramaic and Greek manuscripts, they contain the earliest Hebrew accounts. Do try to keep up.
