(July 19, 2017 at 3:56 pm)Inkfeather132 Wrote:(July 19, 2017 at 2:42 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Who do you think the fountain open to the house of David is referring to? was not Jesus of the house of David? Did he not die to cleanse sin?
Also did you even bother reading chapter 12?
Chapter 12 is clearly speaking of the messiah, chapter 13 is speaking of the exact same event, it just doesn't use a personal pronoun like chapter 12 does
We weren't talking about chapter 12, you specified chapter 13. The first verse is talking about the messiah, yes. But all the others are talking about false prophets, including the verse about wounds on the body.
4 “On that day every prophet will be ashamed of their prophetic vision. They will not put on a prophet’s garment of hair in order to deceive. 5 Each will say, ‘I am not a prophet. I am a farmer; the land has been my livelihood since my youth.’ 6 If someone asks, ‘What are these wounds on your body?’ they will answer, ‘The wounds I was given at the house of my friends.’
The Bible means nothing to me anyway, but it means even less when you blatantly twist it to mean whatever you want it to.
First of all I mentioned both scriptures back in this post
https://atheistforums.org/thread-50056-p...pid1588390
In chapter 12 God clearly used a personal pronoun we he stated "they shall look upon me whom they have pierced", in no way is that making reference to any false prophet, both scripture are speaking of the same event; God clearly stated that he had been pierced \ wounded.
The Jews did not recognize Jesus Christ as the Messiah, hence why they called for his crucifixion. When they finally do recognize him they will want to know how he came to be wounded (after he had rose from the dead, he still had the wounds), to which he will reply that he was wounded in the house of his friends.
There is no twisting of scripture here, it's pretty clear.
