RE: Hybrid theory between freewill and determinism
July 24, 2017 at 7:24 pm
(This post was last modified: July 24, 2017 at 7:24 pm by bennyboy.)
(July 23, 2017 at 10:54 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Personally, I think we have free will, but people really have to learn to use it. Indeed, I suspect that the majority of people at any given point haven't figured out how to do it.
Before we say we have it, we should probably define it.
My definition: Free will is the capacity to express one's nature in decision-making, without undue compulsion or impediment from factors outside the self.
I like this definition, because it works for determinist world views as well as dualistic, spiritual or religious ones. Definitions like "The capacity to have done other than one has chosen to do," i.e. that the self is somehow above or outside causality, are BS in my opinion. You only need the capacity for truly multiple actions if you are truly of a divided nature.