RE: Hybrid theory between freewill and determinism
July 25, 2017 at 11:45 pm
(This post was last modified: July 25, 2017 at 11:56 pm by Rev. Rye.)
(July 25, 2017 at 7:04 pm)Losty Wrote:
Hybrid theory
Eh, I preferred "In the End." Is it too soon to say I always preferred Mike to Chester?
Onto the topic at hand, I grew up in a Christian environment where damn near everything we did except metabolise, breathe, and heartbeat (and I'm sure there may be some Christians who consider even those free will) counted as part of "Free will." Meanwhile, sometimes, free will gets interpreted in such a way that it becomes almost a strawman position. I think the definition I've been arguing for is, at the very least, an reasonably understandable definition, even if it seems a bit more bound in with developmental stage theories than the ideas brought into us by religion and the older philosophies.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
![[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/yxR97P23/harmlesskitchen.png)
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
![[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/yxR97P23/harmlesskitchen.png)
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.