(July 26, 2017 at 2:06 pm)Gearbreak Wrote:(July 26, 2017 at 1:56 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Please do, and actually you backing off is a good sign, because it should say to you, NOT ME, but to you, it is not a worthy argument to defend. Things with evidence don't need apology, or mental masturbation. Things with evidence are subject to repeated testing and falsification and peer review.
Uttering words because it sounds good to you is not evidence. Otherwise every human in our species who ever uttered a word would all be right all at the same time. I really am not treating your claim in this thread any differently than I would a standard old mythology defending theist.
I didn't think it was that worthy of defending in the first place. It's like if I said reeses was the best candy and you sent me a essay on how reeses is the worst candy and I should stop eating it. I'm still eating reeses but I'm not going to argue about it.
Good then why do you keep arguing? None of the candy metaphor is an argument either. No shit, people are going to believe what they want regardless, so? Part you forget is far too many humans sacrifice knowledge out of fear because they do that. It still amounts to intellectual laziness.
You can also staple your nuts to the wall, but I wouldn't recommend it.
