Evidence to Convict?

[Amarok]

Wouldn't there be, for example, bloodstains on the chair matching the victim's? Splinters of wood or whatever in the wound matching damage to the chair? Silly physical stuff like that?

Quite apart from that, those dozen witnesses are in one room at the same time giving broadly the same account; which is completely different to any of the gospel characters who are anonymous, appear nowhere else in any record and contradict on important details, while the gospels themselves were written over a protracted period and many years after the alleged fact. Again, one of these things is not like the others.

Now watch him make up new details to try and refute it