Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 9:34 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?
#1
Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?
ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:

For the average person, precision indicates that an intelligent person guided the outcome. According to Webster's New World College Dictionary, the word "precision" is defined as follows:


"the quality of being precise; exactness, accuracy"


The reverse of precision is imprecision/inaccuracy/inexactness, which is always the result of an accident or a spontaneous event that happens by chance with no one guiding the outcome. Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary defines an accident as:

"a nonessential event that HAPPENS BY CHANCE and has undesirable or unfortunate results." (Source: Websters New Collegiate Dictionary)



Notice that an accident, by definition, is something unplanned aka it "happened by chance." Notice the similarity of the definition for "spontaneous" (as in "spontaneous event").


DEFINITION OF "SPONTANEOUS":

"Spontaneous means unplanned or done on impulse."
http://www.yourdictionary.com/spontaneous




AGRUMENT #1 FOR AN INTELLIGENT CREATOR:

Scientific evidence shows there is extreme precision in everything around us in the natural world. This precision renders the evolution theory and Big Bang theory mere fiction, because both theories rely on accidents or spontaneous events. Precision leaves no room for error or for accidental events. Rather, precision requires deliberation.

Take, for example, the first 60 elements that were discovered on the Periodic Table of the Elements of planet earth. Some of those 60 elements are gases and are therefore invisible to the human eye. The atoms--from which the Earth's elements are made--are specifically related to one another. In turn, the elements--e.g. arsenic, bismuth, chromium, gold, krypton--reflect a distinct, natural numeral order based upon the structure of their atoms. This is a proven LAW.

The precision in the order of the elements made it possible for scientists such as Mendeleyev, Ramsey, Moseley, and Bohr to theorize the existence of unknown elements and their characteristics. These elements were later discovered, just as predicted. Because of the distinct numerical order of the elements, the word LAW is applied to the Periodic Table of the Elements. (Sources: (1) The McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science & Technology, (2) "Periodic Law," from Encyclopdia Britannica, Vol. VII, p. 878, copyright 1978, (3) The Hutchinson Dictionary of Scientific Biography)


SIDE NOTE: Laws found in nature, as defined by Webster's New World Dictionary, are:


"a sequence of events that have been observed to occur with UNVARYING UNIFORMITY under the same conditions."


QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION:
1.
Were it not for the precise relationship among the first 60 discovered elements on the Periodic Table, would scientists have been able to accurately predict the existence of forms of matter that at the time were unknown?

2. Could the precise law within the first 60 discovered elements (on the Periodic Table) have resulted by chance aka spontaneously aka by accident? Or is this evidence for the existence an intelligent Designer/God who guided the outcome?

3. Evolution and Big Bang theories both rely upon things happening by chance aka at random. If evolution or Big Bang were credible explanations for the existence of life on earth or the existence of millions of planets in the heavens, how do either theory account for the Periodic Table of the Elements of planet earth in which the first 60 discovered elements are so precise, and so interrelated with one another, that the Periodic Table has been assigned the word "LAW"?
Reply
#2
RE: Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?
Precision?

Ever look at the moon, asshole?


[Image: lunar_crater.jpg]


http://www.lpi.usra.edu/education/explor...ring.shtml

Your "precise" sky-daddy doesn't seem to know jack shit about orbits.

Billions of years ago the cosmos was more like a giant shooting gallery as your inept "god" kept having his planets nailed by imprecise asteroids and comets. Not so long ago Jupiter swallowed a string of hits from a comet.

Precision my ass.



Try again.
Reply
#3
RE: Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?

[Image: D7612546_714_051859148]


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#4
RE: Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?
A2E, You promised to shut up and go away Here, please deliver.
Reply
#5
RE: Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?
They never keep promises.
Reply
#6
RE: Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?
(August 4, 2013 at 1:25 am)Alter2Ego Wrote:


QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION:
1.
Were it not for the precise relationship among the first 60 discovered elements on the Periodic Table, would scientists have been able to accurately predict the existence of forms of matter that at the time were unknown?

No, not really. So what?

Quote:2. Could the precise law within the first 60 discovered elements (on the Periodic Table) have resulted by chance aka spontaneously aka by accident? Or is this evidence for the existence an intelligent Designer/God who guided the outcome?

This "precise" law could be said to be the result of *random* causal relations since the Big Bang which led to *this* universe and not some other variation. Any other variation would of had its own equally "precise" law due to a different set of causal relations.

You're pointing out a trivial fact about causality. So what? Tacking a deity at the end of said trivial fact is a non-sequitur.

Quote:3. Evolution and Big Bang theories both rely upon things happening by chance aka at random. If evolution or Big Bang were credible explanations for the existence of life on earth or the existence of millions of planets in the heavens, how do either theory account for the Periodic Table of the Elements of planet earth in which the first 60 discovered elements are so precise, and so interrelated with one another, that the Periodic Table has been assigned the word "LAW"?

You're comparing apples to oranges. What the heck does evolution/the Big Bang have to do with the structure of atoms? Why would you expect biology/physical cosmology to be able to account for something in chemistry? It just sounds like expectations from a very confused person.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
Reply
#7
RE: Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?
This should've been posted under religion, not life sciences.
Reply
#8
RE: Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?
Yeah, sorry: you're not going to be able to define your creationist nonsense into existence with this idea of "precision," any more than your fellow frauds were able to do so with information, or intelligent design, or all this other hokum.

(August 4, 2013 at 1:25 am)Alter2Ego Wrote: Take, for example, the first 60 elements that were discovered on the Periodic Table of the Elements of planet earth. Some of those 60 elements are gases and are therefore invisible to the human eye. The atoms--from which the Earth's elements are made--are specifically related to one another. In turn, the elements--e.g. arsenic, bismuth, chromium, gold, krypton--reflect a distinct, natural numeral order based upon the structure of their atoms. This is a proven LAW.

So, to be clear: because the atomic structure of elements has some numeric order when viewed from an outside perspective by humans, that naturally entails design? How?

No, I'm serious: the numbers don't mean anything on their own. An atom of one element is constructed in X way because if it was constructed in Y way it'd be a different element. The numbers, the order that we see after the fact, is simply meaning that we've overlayed on top of something. It's a pattern that we see, nothing more.

Your presupposition that it means something more is something that you'd need to demonstrate, not merely... be smug about.

Quote:The precision in the order of the elements made it possible for scientists such as Mendeleyev, Ramsey, Moseley, and Bohr to theorize the existence of unknown elements and their characteristics. These elements were later discovered, just as predicted. Because of the distinct numerical order of the elements, the word LAW is applied to the Periodic Table of the Elements. (Sources: (1) The McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science & Technology, (2) "Periodic Law," from Encyclopdia Britannica, Vol. VII, p. 878, copyright 1978, (3) The Hutchinson Dictionary of Scientific Biography)

Mhmm, humans are good at pattern recognition. This leads to god how?

Quote:1.[/b] Were it not for the precise relationship among the first 60 discovered elements on the Periodic Table, would scientists have been able to accurately predict the existence of forms of matter that at the time were unknown?

Yes. The patterns there were just the most convenient available. No doubt if the atom of the given elements were arrayed differently, we'd find some other pattern with which to classify them and predict further elements. Whether those predictions would be accurate or not is neither here nor there.

Quote:2. Could the precise law within the first 60 discovered elements (on the Periodic Table) have resulted by chance aka spontaneously aka by accident? Or is this evidence for the existence an intelligent Designer/God who guided the outcome?

No, it's not evidence of an intelligent designer, and your leaping to that conclusion just shows your bias. Unless you can demonstrate that there actually is a design involved, then we must go with the evidence available; that these are naturally occurring atomic structures.

Quote:3. Evolution and Big Bang theories both rely upon things happening by chance aka at random. If evolution or Big Bang were credible explanations for the existence of life on earth or the existence of millions of planets in the heavens, how do either theory account for the Periodic Table of the Elements of planet earth in which the first 60 discovered elements are so precise, and so interrelated with one another, that the Periodic Table has been assigned the word "LAW"?[/color][/font]

First of all, huge non sequitur. Second of all, quit with this dishonest hooey about evolution being an accident. Third of all, the comparison isn't even valid, because biology and atomic theory are different fields of science.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#9
RE: Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?
Alter2ego please learn more about the subjects you comment on.
Its getting embarrassing now.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#10
RE: Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?
Precision is something we attribute into things and something that is inherent.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How Nature was able to understand what we need. RayOfLight 30 3508 October 14, 2017 at 10:35 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Evidence to Convict? RoadRunner79 262 63892 August 15, 2017 at 12:17 am
Last Post: Astonished
  On the nature, reliability and abuses of memory. Whateverist 7 1239 August 29, 2016 at 4:02 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Sleep patterns. Nature or Nurture? ignoramus 19 1978 July 6, 2016 at 4:19 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  Is‏ ‏there 50 evidence of evolution?‎ king krish 74 11670 January 14, 2015 at 1:50 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Nature: Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Dolorian 10 4061 October 12, 2014 at 10:52 am
Last Post: Chas
  Researchers Find More Evidence That Dolphins Use Names pocaracas 6 2213 July 25, 2013 at 11:02 am
Last Post: Doubting Thomas
  Evidence of life on Europa and Enceladus? popeyespappy 7 3124 July 8, 2013 at 3:36 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Best Evidence For Evolution RonaldReagansGhost666 35 15483 February 12, 2013 at 7:06 am
Last Post: Zone
  Women and Nature KichigaiNeko 18 7251 August 4, 2012 at 4:07 am
Last Post: Oldandeasilyconfused



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)