(August 2, 2017 at 12:41 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:(August 2, 2017 at 11:58 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Even with an alleged victim, I'm reluctant to convict based just on eyewitness testimony. I would really like to know if the witnesses had a motive to falsely accuse RR.
That's what cross examination is for. Something that's conveniently lacking in the gospel claims.
Because of the special pleading nature of the whole enterprise. They ARE RIGHT, period, the word of that book is infallible.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.