Evidence to Convict?

[RoadRunner79]

As I said in the scenario, there is no other definitive physical evidence found to corroborate.   If you have difficulty understanding this, then imagine that part of the testimony is that we where all playing a vigorous game of musical chairs, that the chairs are of a material that does not readily collect finger prints, or that multiple people handled multiple chairs for whatever reason.

Astreja introduced the idea of their being fingerprints, as an example of what would constitute better evidence to justify a conviciton. Your response to her was imbecilic. If you have difficulty understanding this, then imagine that someone introduced a new factor and you either acted like you couldn't comprehend the implications or actually couldn't comprehend them.

Thanks,   I did miss that part if Astreja was trying to change things though.
However if the fingerprints don't conclusively point to me as the attacker, then of what evidence are they?

I do find the difficulty in answering without modifying things to be informative though.