RE: Evidence to Convict?
August 2, 2017 at 9:49 pm
(This post was last modified: August 2, 2017 at 9:54 pm by LadyForCamus.)
The testimony of 11 witnesses may be reasonably convincing when the claim is, "RR hit that guy in the head with a chair." (I'm assuming the poor shmuck has a mark on his head as evidence of the claim he was, in fact, hit.)
When the claim is, "a god exists who is omniscient and omnibenevolent, created the universe and all living things, created humans (who ate a magical fruit because a snake told them to)
then sent himself to earth in the form of a man, his son (?), who died and then came back to life to join his god-dad in the alternate, timeless, spaceless dimension where he resides."
Yeah...no amount of testimony in the world, in the absence of corroborative evidence, is sufficient for that, RR. Not to rational folks, anyway.
When the claim is, "a god exists who is omniscient and omnibenevolent, created the universe and all living things, created humans (who ate a magical fruit because a snake told them to)
then sent himself to earth in the form of a man, his son (?), who died and then came back to life to join his god-dad in the alternate, timeless, spaceless dimension where he resides."
Yeah...no amount of testimony in the world, in the absence of corroborative evidence, is sufficient for that, RR. Not to rational folks, anyway.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
