In the hierarchy of evidence, testimony is basically on the bottom of the totem pole. In and of itself, it is completely worthless. Just like every other type of evidence merely being but one of many pieces in a larger puzzle, testimony is more like a form of weak glue than an actual piece itself, helping the other actual pieces fit together or not connect in the way it might seem. On its own, it is never considered reliable evidence, period. You've heard the explanation(s) as to why that is and have continued to fail to acknowledge this, among other things for what are fairly obvious reasons. DropShit apparently has the same lazy mentality of not understanding how incredibly insufficient that is. Sure, the 'truth' is a great thing to tell but if you aren't reliably able to recount events, or if you're the only one among the witnesses who will, what the fuck good is it?
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
