RE: Evidence to Convict?
August 3, 2017 at 10:19 am
(This post was last modified: August 3, 2017 at 10:20 am by Mister Agenda.)
RoadRunner79 Wrote:Who said that the claim wasn't investigated.... other means of corroboration, simply didn't result in any definitive evidence.
So you're now going to allow things into your story that you didn't say in the first place? You seem rather inconsistent on that point. Is there an actual injured party in evidence?
RoadRunner79 Wrote:Now I didn't get into making up individual detailed testimonies for each person, with background information and such. And I agree, it's going to depend on the details (some of which may give reason to doubt). But what if you do not have any good reason to doubt.
Due to presumption of innocence (or the null hypothesis), I always have a good reason to doubt.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.