(August 3, 2017 at 12:05 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:
As i said he will keep changing the narrative to suit his agenda rather then let it stand on it's own . Because it can't . And his ignorance of forensics just compounds this and produces the need to keep making stuff up. To a point were the crime is indeed impossible or at least extremely unlikely .
Where do you think that I have changed the narrative so greatly? What do you think is my agenda? What do you think is my ignorance of forensics that makes this scenario impossible? It appears, that you are saying that forensics can solve every crime, and that if it can't, then there was no crime committed.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther