RE: Evidence to Convict?
August 3, 2017 at 1:01 pm
(This post was last modified: August 3, 2017 at 1:03 pm by RoadRunner79.)
(August 3, 2017 at 12:22 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:RR Wrote:Are you trying to change the scenario to not deal with a conclusion based primarily on witness testimony?
Speaking of evasion, that's what you're doing here with my question about whether you are claiming that I have tried to evade your point. That I have not tried to change the scenario in that fashion or for that reason is immaterial to whether you are claiming I did.
RR, to MA: People are changing my scenario to evade my point!
MA, to RR: Are you claiming that I have tried to evade your point?
RR, to MA, seemingly: If you say you were, I'm claiming that you did; but if you say you weren't, I'm not claiming that you did....
I think that it appears that you are. But was allowing you to clarify, in case I misunderstood your intentions.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther