Korean meat processor wins bid to buy U.S. chicken company

[theVOID]

I'm sorry but capitalism is an economic system based on competition, whereas socialism is based on co-operation.Fundamental difference.

That's not true, capitalism has both competition and cooperation, what is known as mutual self-interest, I cooperate with people in the economy because it's valuable to me, I cooperate by offering my labour at a cost to someone who is willing to pay for a service, we both get what we want - I compete with other people with the same skills, we both want the work, the person hiring wants the best value for money - the price I can charge is a function of the demand for my services relative to the supply of said services.


What I take issue with is coerced or compulsory cooperation, telling someone that they must do something because it is in the interest of others.

Russia is interesting in that its form of communism gave way to gangster capitalism and over the last 20 years the rich have doubled their wealth, 2/3rds are no better off and the poor were better off under the old system.( source Moscow School of Economics ).

Sure, Crony capitalism is a terrible system;

Crony capitalism is a term describing a capitalist economy in which success in business depends on close relationships between business people and government officials. It may be exhibited by favoritism in the distribution of legal permits, government grants, special tax breaks, and so forth.

We both agree that tyrannies are the problem and Crony Capitalism is the capitalist equivalent of a totalitarian socialist state - The problem in both circumstances is not whether the economy works from mutual self interest and private ownership or coerced cooperation, but that people who are greedy have the force of government working to serve their interests.

The thing I think we will agree on is that the use of government to support special interests is pretty much the worst thing that can happen, regardless of whether the special interests are corporate entities or the whim of an idealogical dictator.

---

theVoid,
I don't have any right at all to limit what someone takes from a business. I do have a right to express an opinion as to why a maximum wage might make more sense than a minimum wage. That's what I express.

Of course, expression is fine, I would even support public condemnation of rich people who pay their employees as little as possible while making massive profits, but the important question is would you legislate it?. That is where my concern with authority lies, while I may condemn someone who does such a thing I have no business coercing them with threats of imprisonment. Someone who is willing to work for a low wage, your typical unskilled worker for instance, then they are free to do so and a business is free to employ them, despite how much money they make.

Also, out of curiosity, how would the numbers work on a maximum wage? Would you say that no person can make x% more than their lowest paid employee or something along those lines?

As to your habits, frankly I don't care a jot. It was another who described you as a stoner, a term unknown to me. So are you?

Well, given my forum title is "Administoner" I'd say that's a safe bet