Evidence to Convict?

[RoadRunner79]

You don't have to do anything.  Two of us disagreed and said it was evidence.  A few more said that it was evidence, but not enough. And without counting, I feel fairly safe to say that no evidence was in the majority. 

Also, your assessment of me saying that testimony must be believed unquestionably 100% of the time, in every case is simply incorrect.  I said no such thing, and believe I even stated this here before.  This is only about giving opinions and our conclusions.  For the verdict, I went with what I thought was the majority opinion.  I'm not trying to make any argument, so I don't know why you seem upset, and the need to call me an asshole?

If not an asshole, then a fucking liar because that 100% standard is the only way you can possibly justify believing any of what the bible has to say. Or are you just a hypocrite? You don't get to have it both ways, kid. Admit you're not playing by the rules or just stop.

You know what, forget about it... I don't want to discuss anything with you anymore.  If after that many times of telling your that is not my position, and this topic is not about the bible,  you still want to mis-represent me.   Your not going to listen anyway.  And if your angry about a mischaracterization that only exists in your imagination OK... I'm done trying to help. 

And if you want to make up some other reason, other than what I said here.... I don't care.... If others can't see it.... they're no better and there is nothing I can say to change their minds either.