Evidence to Convict?

[Amarok]

You don't have to do anything.  Two of us disagreed and said it was evidence.  A few more said that it was evidence, but not enough. And without counting, I feel fairly safe to say that no evidence was in the majority. 

Also, your assessment of me saying that testimony must be believed unquestionably 100% of the time, in every case is simply incorrect.  I said no such thing, and believe I even stated this here before.  This is only about giving opinions and our conclusions.  For the verdict, I went with what I thought was the majority opinion.  I'm not trying to make any argument, so I don't know why you seem upset, and the need to call me an asshole?

If not an asshole, then a fucking liar because that 100% standard is the only way you can possibly justify believing any of what the bible has to say. Or are you just a hypocrite? You don't get to have it both ways, kid. Admit you're not playing by the rules or just stop.

Pretty much