Evidence to Convict?

[Ravenshire]

people aren't listening anyway.

Maybe it's because we can't tell what the fuck you're trying to say. You're all over the map, changing your stance every third post, avoiding legitimate inquiries to the very heart of the stated matter and even changing the text of posts after they're quoted.

And you wonder why people aren't taking you at face value any more.

All your twisting, turning, ducking and dodging has led me to the conclusion that had enough people said "yes, RR. Of course testimony is acceptable evidence" we would have gotten a gotcha argument about testimony in the buy-bull. If that really wasn't where you were going, maybe being so disingenuous and flat out dishonest wasn't the right tack to take.