(August 11, 2017 at 4:08 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(August 11, 2017 at 3:39 pm)Astonished Wrote: I mean, is that in any way unreasonable?
Depends on your goals. If what you wish to achieve is to get rid of the poors while creating an army of white and delightsome passive conformists who accept every intrusion bny the state no matter how fundamental, then no...it;s not unreasonable at all.
Sustainable population growth without runaway overpopulation, as far as what the genetic mods and reproductive regulation are for. Who the fuck says they're all going to be white, or any other ethnicity, maybe they can be made to tolerate low oxygen levels and all have a cyanotic skin tone? Then we can all be Mary Poppins, y'all.
![[Image: C_uWb-MVoAAC8js.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C_uWb-MVoAAC8js.jpg)
One would hope increasing intellect across the board would lead everyone to the conclusion that a socialistic framework would be the best option to prevent anyone from lacking what they need and ensure power doesn't become too consolidated, and of course wealth equating with power wouldn't really be a thing in that kind of system. But that's up to them to decide. I'm just not counting on them ever becoming smart enough to not be fools and wrap their tools, know what I'm sayin', y'all?
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
