Game of Thrones Season 7 Discussion [SPOILERS WITHIN]

[Homeless Nutter]

It's not unnecessary. As a non-bastard targaryen male, Jon has more claim to the throne than Daenarys has.[...]

Oh no, not unecessary at all. It is extremely important to the story. It proves that Rhaegar and Lyanna were married, and Elia Martell was divorced. Which makes Jon not just the son of the Prince Regent of the realm, but a trueborn son, and true heir to the Iron Throne. [...]

Are you being sarcastic? It means he's the rightful heir to the Iron Throne ya twat.

LOL... Who gives a toss? Daenerys (and her brother before her) was - by this logic - "the true heir to the Iron Throne". How much did that help? The Lords of Westeros - not to mention the peasants - didn't give a flying f*ck about legitimate Targaryen lineage, when Robert was king, when War of the Five Kings was going on, when Cersei crowned herself queen, or when they made bastard Jon Snow King in the North. Why does it matter all of a sudden, that some anal-retentive maester made a note of some secret annulment and secret marriage, among the records of his sh*ts? Who's supposed to care? Gods?

Yeah - it's stupid and it makes Jon Snow a worse character - just another secret royal, who deserves sh*t by birthright, like in every other fairy-tale. And the way they had semi-illiterate Gillie conveniently stumble upon this "nugget" of information by pure chance - that's just cringe-worthy, lazy writing...

[...]Also, you seem to be missing the point about Jon's moment with Drogon. He is a Targaryen, the dragons are notoriously violent towards non-Targs.[...]

Then what on Earth was Daenerys doing, riding her dragon at him? Did she want to kill him, or is she just a dumb b*tch, with no control over that thing between her legs? Women dragon-riders, amirite?