It's amazing how anyone like Ken Ham can claim that there's such a thing as 'historical science' which, according to his definition, doesn't actually amount to anything because 'were you there' defeats it no matter the conclusion. But you can actually watch evolution in action practically everywhere. Bacteria becoming more resistant to efforts to eliminate them, people born with various mutations like six fingers or extremely high muscle or bone density, or, if you're really fucking picky, the fruit fly differentiation experiment. It should not be possible not to be charged with fraud for denying evolution at this point, bar none.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
