(August 21, 2017 at 1:32 pm)Tazzycorn Wrote:(August 13, 2017 at 6:52 pm)Godscreated Wrote: Why do you question what is your tactics with the Bible, you go to biased sights to get your info against the Bible and parade it around as the truth. And then there's this by two others "OUT of CONTEXT," really, tell me you didn't mean it, you accuse Christians of saying this and then you turn around and say the same thing, so that you know that's called a double standard. You guys need to get real and accept your does of medicine.
GC
That's not what I did scum-bucket, and you know it. Frankly I bet the real reason for your new account wasn't that you lost access but you wanted to ditch your well deserved reputation for misreprentating others.
What I actually showed was that the Dawkins "quote" was from an anonymous blogger and, at best, unattributable. Most likely (to at least seventh sigma) it was a bare faced lie. And then I went on to say that even if a true quote it doesn't say what you lying shitbag christards make out it says.
So stuff your special pleading and attempts to denigrate me you little piece of shit.
Tazzycorn,
Maybe I missed something, but I think you might be mixing me and GC together. I posted the article. I don't have a problem with the criticisms given as I think they are fair, i.e., it is not clear what, if anything, Dawkins really said. And, I just wasn't trying to make it out to say anything, I wanted to know people's opinion regarding it.
It was GC that objected to your post. So it seems like your first sentence is to GC.
But the second seems to be at me as it was me that recently got the new account and had the old merged therewith. That being said, I wonder whether the "well deserved reputation for misrepresenting others" was supposed to be for me or GC. If me, could you explain what you are talking about, i.e., where do you get that I have a reputation for misrepresenting others?
The rest clearly is directed to GC, not me.
