Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 10, 2026, 2:50 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Very short version of the long argument.
#28
RE: Very short version of the long argument.
Oh by the way MK... your argument is "bollocks" in the sense of shite of course. Not "bollocks" in the sense of the dog's . . . or the mutt's nuts, cats pajamas, bee's knees, turtle's fertiles, etc.

Or in other words... your argument is "Balls in the sense of balls". Note the following red text:

Quote:Stephen enters a bookshop. Hugh is the assistant. Stephen stares at Hugh for a long time.

Hugh: Can I help you?

Stephen:
(Holding up a book)
Did you write this?

Hugh:
(Examining book)
Jane Eyre. No, that was Charlotte Bronte as a matter of fact.

Stephen: Right. Well I'd like to speak to her then please.

Hugh: I'm afraid she's no longer with us.

Stephen: Oh? Indeed? I can hardly say I'm surprised. Where can I get in touch with her?

Hugh: No, no. I mean "no longer with us" in the sense of "dead".

Stephen: Dead?

Hugh: Quite dead.

Stephen: When did she die exactly?

Hugh: Um ... 1855 I believe I'm right in saying.

Stephen: Let me see, 18:55 . . . that's five minutes to seven, isn't it?

Hugh: I'm sorry. I mean "1855" in the sense of the year "1855". Was there some problem?

Stephen: Well you'll have to do I suppose, since you sold me the book. I want my money back.

Hugh: Do you mind me asking why?

Stephen: I'll tell you why. Because this book is balls, that's why. It is complete balls.

Hugh: I'm afraid I really can't agree with you there.

Stephen: Oh can't you? Well listen to this then ...
(riffles through book and selects a passage)
"I mounted into the window-seat: gathering up my feet, I sat cross-legged, like a Turk." I mean???? It's just balls.

Hugh: Balls in what sense?

Stephen: Balls in the sense of balls. I mean "window-seat"? What window-seat? This is on the first page. Window seat. Where is this window seat, hm? What's it doing? And what Turk? I've never seen a Turk mount a window-seat. Simply balls. Nothing but balls.

Hugh: Well I think you're supposed to imagine it.

Stephen: Oh? All right, then, all right then: what about this ... um ... chapter thirty-eight ... "Reader, I married him." Now if that isn't balls, kindly fax me an explanation of what is. "Reader"? What reader? Or are you supposed to imagine this reader as well?

Hugh: No, that's you. It's addressed to you, the reader of the book.

Stephen: Oh BALLLLLSSSS! How could she know me? You just told me the stupid tart died at five to seven.

Hugh: Well not you specifically. I mean whoever is reading it at the time. Jane Eyre is telling you that she married Mr Rochester.

Stephen: Jane Eyre is a made-up character! She didn't exist!

Hugh: No but she writes the story. She is the "I" of the story.

Stephen: MAKE YOUR FRIGGING MIND UP! You just told me Charlotte Bronte wrote the story.

Hugh: She did ... but ...

Stephen: Well you're clearly as confused as I am. It's just BALLS and you know it. Complete balls. I want my money back. I want to read a book that doesn't go on about window-seats you've never even heard of or have some mad bitch who's supposed to be dead calling you "reader" all the time.

Hugh: What about this ... proving very popular.

Hugh hands Stephen a book.

Stephen: What's this?

Hugh: "The Invalid" by Myra Penworthy Fennerweave.

Stephen: Any good?

Hugh: Excellent.

Stephen starts to read

Stephen: "Talbot entered the room in a feverish haste, bearing his precious cargo before him like a votive offering. Elizabeth lay back on her bed, her face pale and pinched. "Richard is that you?" she moaned plaintively." Oh this is just complete BALLS! Balls, balls, balls.

Hugh: It's not actually. It's true. It actually happened.

Stephen Oh double balls and bollocks!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 8:17 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Alex K - September 11, 2017 at 8:25 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 8:32 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Alex K - September 11, 2017 at 10:05 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by brewer - September 11, 2017 at 8:33 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 8:35 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by brewer - September 11, 2017 at 8:37 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 8:39 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by brewer - September 11, 2017 at 8:47 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by bennyboy - September 11, 2017 at 12:21 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 12, 2017 at 2:19 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by LadyForCamus - September 12, 2017 at 6:54 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 12, 2017 at 7:40 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by LadyForCamus - September 12, 2017 at 9:29 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 13, 2017 at 7:48 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Astreja - September 11, 2017 at 3:21 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by bennyboy - September 11, 2017 at 8:39 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Athene - September 11, 2017 at 8:44 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 8:45 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Athene - September 11, 2017 at 8:52 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 9:02 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Athene - September 11, 2017 at 9:15 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 11, 2017 at 9:20 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 9:22 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 11, 2017 at 9:29 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 8:47 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by brewer - September 11, 2017 at 9:03 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Edwardo Piet - September 11, 2017 at 12:39 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 11, 2017 at 9:24 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 9:40 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Edwardo Piet - September 11, 2017 at 9:26 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 11, 2017 at 9:48 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 9:51 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 11, 2017 at 9:52 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Edwardo Piet - September 11, 2017 at 9:53 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Edwardo Piet - September 11, 2017 at 10:07 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Minimalist - September 11, 2017 at 12:32 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by LadyForCamus - September 11, 2017 at 1:53 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Succubus - September 11, 2017 at 2:24 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Astonished - September 12, 2017 at 1:14 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Minimalist - September 12, 2017 at 1:49 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Edwardo Piet - September 13, 2017 at 2:36 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Crossless2.0 - September 14, 2017 at 11:33 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Edwardo Piet - September 15, 2017 at 12:57 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by ignoramus - September 12, 2017 at 7:58 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 12, 2017 at 8:11 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by WinterHold - September 13, 2017 at 8:53 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Astreja - September 13, 2017 at 8:59 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by WinterHold - September 13, 2017 at 9:43 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Whateverist - September 13, 2017 at 12:11 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by WinterHold - September 13, 2017 at 12:51 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 13, 2017 at 12:54 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by WinterHold - September 13, 2017 at 1:11 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 13, 2017 at 1:41 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by WinterHold - September 13, 2017 at 1:50 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 13, 2017 at 3:08 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by The Valkyrie - September 13, 2017 at 3:44 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Edwardo Piet - September 14, 2017 at 8:34 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by LadyForCamus - September 14, 2017 at 10:28 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  An Argument Against Determinism Disagreeable 32 4828 March 13, 2026 at 9:11 pm
Last Post: Disagreeable
  The Kalam Cosmological Argument Disagreeable 123 30003 December 15, 2024 at 6:11 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  The classic ontological argument Modern Atheism 20 4840 October 3, 2024 at 12:45 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The modal ontological argument for God Disagreeable 29 7234 August 10, 2024 at 8:57 pm
Last Post: MetisX
  The argument from degree LinuxGal 9 2563 January 1, 2023 at 12:14 am
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  Veridican Argument for the Existence of God The Veridican 14 5309 January 16, 2022 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: brewer
  [Serious] An Argument Against Hedonistic Moral Realism SenseMaker007 25 7462 June 19, 2019 at 7:21 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  [Serious] An Argument For Ethical Egoism SenseMaker007 29 8414 June 19, 2019 at 6:30 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Argument against Intelligent Design Jrouche 27 8224 June 2, 2019 at 5:04 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  The argument from power. Mystic 67 17611 October 6, 2018 at 5:02 pm
Last Post: Astreja



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)