Well, I don't have any problem with that part of his argument. You can't know something that isn't there.
The problem I have is he doesn't actually prove there is any ultimate goodness to be known, or furthermore, even if there is any ultimate goodness (as I personally believe there is, although he failed to argue for it) how that has anything to do with "God". Goodness makes God redundant AFAIC.
The problem I have is he doesn't actually prove there is any ultimate goodness to be known, or furthermore, even if there is any ultimate goodness (as I personally believe there is, although he failed to argue for it) how that has anything to do with "God". Goodness makes God redundant AFAIC.