RE: Very short version of the long argument.
September 12, 2017 at 6:54 am
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2017 at 6:56 am by LadyForCamus.)
(September 12, 2017 at 2:19 am)MysticKnight Wrote:(September 11, 2017 at 12:21 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Yes.
If who you are is objective knowledge to goodness, then it's not relative.
(September 11, 2017 at 1:53 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Bold mine. I certainly don't accept this premise. I could feel a deep, personal connection to unicorns or Santa, but that doesn't mean those things necessarily exist in reality. It only means that they exist, in concept, in my mind. Just like your god.
What's disputable is your assumption that some intangible value or idea that you've labeled "ultimate goodness" exists in the first place. You have to demonstrate that it's an actual thing before you can draw any truthful conclusions from an argument that uses it in its premises.
What you are using the word "connection" as it is not what I meant. Words have different meanings in different contexts. And that is not my meaning.
Um...care to clarify your intended meaning of the word "connection" then? Since it's part of your argument and all.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
