An alternative to atheist thought

[Astonished]

Hi, they say that the devil's greatest deceit is to convince people he doesn't exist. Please consider the following ideas regarding life and the grand scheme of things. A saying goes “nothing is what it seems to be”. I say that Life itself is not what it seems to be. Here I expose knowledge of facts that have been kept hidden from most of society. I also put forward what I consider to be the correct way of interpreting life. Although unlikely in this lifetime, I hope everybody who reads this work will find the wisdom it contains and will find the courage to do what they know to be right. I'm not worried though because due to the nature of life, either in this lifetime or another one, at some point in time, every individual conscience will realize the truth of what I say here.

Ah ha ha ha. Ha. Cute. Gonna be uncharacteristially thorough and sodomize each and every one of these chapters (by description; not going to bother reading any further since it's going to be just as inane as your blurbs about them). Might take a while to get through all of them but I'm gonna do it (unless I get bored...people like you bore me once you're done pissing me off).

CHAPTER 1: The Evil Nature of the Source

There is a single source from which everything emanates. This Universal Source gives rise to everything: what is alive and not alive, real and imaginary, good and evil, matter and spirit, etc. Everything whatsoever is a former part of the Source and is made up of the same basic substances as the Source. The Source, (which is the Universal Consciousness, Intelligence, or Mind) is sick. It is psychotic. Because of its psychosis, the Universal Source auto mutilates to produce everything that exists. It severs parts and particles from itself to use them for satisfying its sick desires. We are those particles. We are former parts of the Source and are contaminated with the same psychosis it has, which results in conflict, disease, and all evil in life. The sick nature of Life and of the Universal Intelligence cannot be healed. There is nothing outside of the universe that could help it; and because the Universal Consciousness is trapped in its delusions, there is no way it can heal itself.

If everything has always existed and merely changes form (read some cosmology, dude) then it can't really be called a source in the first place, everything that exists just...is. No need to separate a 'source' from any substance that exists. That's your first problem. This is why creatards are so pathetic, they can't imagine everything else apart from god always existing, yet when you look at the singularity and what guys like Lawrence Krause hypothesize about it, the explanations of how time behaves make far more sense than magic, so really, it's easy to see the entirety of the universe as 'existence' whereas the creatard will look at it as 'creation'.

You then attribute a consciousness to this non-existent source. That's your second problem. This is exactly the problem with religions; not only can no one prove their bullshit gods even exist but they always want to say their particular interpretation of them fits their particular description, also without justification. So you're nothing more than another run-of-the-mill bullshit peddler. I'm bored already.

You attribute a particular type of personality to this non-existent consciousness of this non-existent source. That's three problems and I'm four sentences in. I won't even bother to ask you what you're basing this asshattery on because your shit sombrero is clearly visible. Then you just bullshit further about this non-existent source with its non-existent consciousness and non-existent personality somehow having an effect on things that actually exist and that it has no control over itself (which would contradict the notion of it having 'intelligence') which, if you were a deist, would make sense and the only thing you could reasonably say is that it's inscrutable and utterly irrelevant in the highest degree to any of us, but no, you insist on making it something more tangible and, I'm guessing, don't even ATTEMPT to provide anything other than post-hoc rationalizations that you can twist to support this half-baked and transparently plagiarized from H.P. Lovecraft idea.

That's it, I give up. No sane person could get through the first chapter of your book without demanding their money back and calling for you to be committed to a psychiatric hospital or locked up in a prison for guys like Kent Hovind.