(September 24, 2017 at 1:58 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: Meh. Parents pass on their beliefs to their children under conditions in which it is unlikely for the child to doubt. If you want to call that indoctrination, then yes, I believe parents have the right to indoctrinate their children into their religious beliefs. Somewhere along the line you have to make the case that having religious beliefs is an evil unto itself in order to make the case that transmitting their religious beliefs in this manner is immoral. Parents "indoctrinate" their children into a lot of beliefs. I don't think it makes sense to interfere with the process by which we transmit our culture to our children. What are you suggesting? Criminal penalties if "teaching" passes over into "indoctrination"? I don't personally believe that the way a family transmits its culture to its children can be characterized that simply. Children are taught the concepts of religion. That's more than half the battle toward getting them to believe. Is that indoctrination? I don't think so.
I'm talking about assholes like Ken Ham who deliberately lie to children about science and whatnot to push a specific agenda, not just Xtian shit but HIS version of YEC, when he's been called out repeatedly for these falsehoods and is not being charged with fraud and allowed to continue to do what he's doing to those kids with impunity. Complete biasing of facts and setting them up for utter denial of reality without their knowledge or consent, not even to consider the possibility that they could ever be wrong about it, THAT is the kind of shit that should not be tolerated. Not the passive read-them-heavily-edited-snippets before bedtime thing you see on TV and movies, and telling them 'I don't know' instead of 'gawd' as answers where appropriate. Things a reasonable, sane person would do. Someone like CL apparently doesn't give herself enough credit to think of herself as different from those other a-holes, or she just wasn't listening to the multiple attempts I tried at differentiating brainwashing/indoctrination from simple instruction or storytelling. Of course if it's the latter then maybe she's a bit more like Ken Ham than we might have hoped. The whole fingers-in-the-ears going 'la la la' thing isn't fashionable.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.