RE: Reasoning showing homosexuality is evil.
October 22, 2017 at 8:39 am
(This post was last modified: October 22, 2017 at 8:43 am by Whateverist.)
But it is a slippery slope this classifying of differences as normal. On the one hand, you have movements to classify deafness and dwarfism as "normal human variation'. Those who grow up with the conditions find them familiar and the familiar is comforting. But really? Toss out hearing and that isn't a defect? Those two seem a bridge too far, and the "pathological" label seems justified. Dwarfism less so, but I believe there are at least mobility disadvantages.
But homosexuality seems as clearly a part of "normal human variation" as left handedness. It would only count as a defect if an entire population were homosexual and unable to survive for lack of procreation. But with runaway over population, that clearly isn't our situation. So where are the negative consequences which would justify the "defect" or "pathological" label?
Whether or not some backward group of camel fuckers thinks it is objectively immoral in the eyes of their God is completely irrelevant.
But homosexuality seems as clearly a part of "normal human variation" as left handedness. It would only count as a defect if an entire population were homosexual and unable to survive for lack of procreation. But with runaway over population, that clearly isn't our situation. So where are the negative consequences which would justify the "defect" or "pathological" label?
Whether or not some backward group of camel fuckers thinks it is objectively immoral in the eyes of their God is completely irrelevant.
