RE: Reasoning showing homosexuality is evil.
October 22, 2017 at 1:33 pm
(This post was last modified: October 22, 2017 at 1:53 pm by Mystic.)
(October 21, 2017 at 4:04 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: What is "Taqleed"?
It means imitating or blindly following a scholar.
Here is the thing: If I can be just as good left-handed as I am right handed, I would choose to be both.
If it is a choice and both are beautiful things and honorable things, both sexual relationships, I would imagine it would be better to do both, get a complete love, as Albert Pike teaches.
If it is a choice, and one was wrong and ugly, it would be better to choose one over the other.
If it not a choice, I would like to know why free-will cannot choose this. Simply stating try for yourself, won't mean anything.
Obviously, some choices are very fast decision making, and others are decisions that are very long processes, and might even start early as a child.
If it is evil if free-will is involved, I think it follows free-will can choose any evil state even it if is a very long process.
If it is good if free-will is involved, then it is Albert Pike says, it is complete of a human to experience both.
What would that mean for family structure (units of four?)?
I don't know.... I know for certain the people social engineering society believe it is a choice but believe it is a good choice to sexually be attracted to both. The free-will regarding it debate is just a stepping stone to this where they make it acceptable, than will promote it as beneficial and part of enlightenment.
I choose to believe the Messengers were honest with the people, and I believe in honest guiding leaders, not those who mask what they believe in deceptions thinking the masses are not ready for the truth.
I don't believe masses are not to be taught the truth. I believe the truth is not to be hidden but we must strive our utmost to convey it and help the Message of the Messengers in that regard.
