Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 23, 2025, 9:38 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
For Rich Fetuses Only, Though
#18
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though
(November 3, 2017 at 10:16 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:
(November 3, 2017 at 9:57 pm)Court Jester Wrote: If they are busting their ass and honestly doing everything that they can, I feel bad for them. But if they keep at it, they will get to a better situation. It's not always quick and/or easy, but it will happen.

Yeah, except when it doesn't get better.

(November 3, 2017 at 9:57 pm)Court Jester Wrote: If they aren't willing to take the needed steps for self improvement and just expect to make $30 an hour flipping burgers at McDonalds (if they are willing to work at all), or they make $30,000 a year and get ejected from their $300,000 house because they made a really bad personal life decision with their finances; I'm not going to be bothered by that at all. Really sucks if they have kids, but it's not my place or responsibility, nor should it be.

Do you really believe the situation is as black and white as you describe it here? That the only people who are in financial trouble (who aren't handicapped) are either stupid or lazy?

Yes. Absolutely yes.

I wouldn't say that they are all stupid and I wouldn't say that they are all lazy, but likely one and/or the other. Doesn't mean that they are all bad people either though.

In the end; Life's about choices. I shouldn't have to pay for other's consistently negative choices any more than you should be required to pay the money that you earn for you and your family for my negative life choices.

It's not right for those that are working the hardest and reduces their drive to improve their life because they don't earn more by putting forth more effort. It's also not right for the people exhibiting the least effort or society as a whole because if promotes the idea that the bare-minimum is good enough.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Minimalist - November 2, 2017 at 9:50 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by brewer - November 3, 2017 at 9:02 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by vorlon13 - November 3, 2017 at 9:14 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by brewer - November 3, 2017 at 9:20 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Court Jester - November 3, 2017 at 9:12 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Minimalist - November 3, 2017 at 9:21 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Mystical - November 6, 2017 at 3:09 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Court Jester - November 3, 2017 at 9:33 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Ravenshire - November 3, 2017 at 9:39 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Minimalist - November 3, 2017 at 11:09 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Court Jester - November 3, 2017 at 9:57 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Ravenshire - November 3, 2017 at 10:16 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Amarok - November 3, 2017 at 10:21 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Court Jester - November 4, 2017 at 12:42 am
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Aegon - November 5, 2017 at 12:58 am
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Amarok - November 3, 2017 at 10:00 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Court Jester - November 3, 2017 at 10:03 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Amarok - November 3, 2017 at 10:06 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Court Jester - November 3, 2017 at 10:10 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by The Grand Nudger - November 3, 2017 at 10:25 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by The Grand Nudger - November 4, 2017 at 9:07 am
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by brewer - November 4, 2017 at 9:43 am
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Mr.wizard - November 4, 2017 at 9:41 am
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by The Grand Nudger - November 4, 2017 at 10:25 am
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by brewer - November 4, 2017 at 1:02 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by The Grand Nudger - November 4, 2017 at 1:16 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by brewer - November 4, 2017 at 8:58 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Court Jester - November 4, 2017 at 8:43 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Amarok - November 4, 2017 at 9:05 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by LadyForCamus - November 4, 2017 at 9:18 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by The Grand Nudger - November 4, 2017 at 9:22 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by brewer - November 4, 2017 at 9:30 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by The Grand Nudger - November 4, 2017 at 9:38 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by brewer - November 5, 2017 at 6:34 am
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Amarok - November 4, 2017 at 10:34 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by The Grand Nudger - November 4, 2017 at 10:52 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by LadyForCamus - November 5, 2017 at 3:21 am
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Ravenshire - November 5, 2017 at 1:05 am
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Aegon - November 5, 2017 at 1:36 am
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by The Grand Nudger - November 5, 2017 at 8:38 am
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by LadyForCamus - November 5, 2017 at 9:58 am
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by The Grand Nudger - November 5, 2017 at 11:06 am
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Autumnlicious - November 5, 2017 at 4:00 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Court Jester - November 5, 2017 at 4:07 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Autumnlicious - November 5, 2017 at 4:19 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Court Jester - November 5, 2017 at 8:03 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Abaddon_ire - November 5, 2017 at 9:38 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Amarok - November 5, 2017 at 9:58 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Abaddon_ire - November 5, 2017 at 10:46 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Court Jester - November 6, 2017 at 2:50 pm
RE: For Rich Fetuses Only, Though - by Edwardo Piet - November 5, 2017 at 9:03 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Who will swallow the Corona virus debt? The rich or the poor? Greatest I am 35 3310 December 1, 2020 at 3:07 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Consistency Is Not a Virtue If Your Only Consistently Evil The Architect Of Fate 3 402 September 2, 2020 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  "A good guy with a gun" saves the day, only to be shot dead himself Aegon 30 4254 November 14, 2018 at 11:23 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  The Orange Fucktard Isn't The Only One Minimalist 0 328 August 30, 2018 at 1:37 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Mom who killed her two year old only gets 40 years Sterben 15 2642 July 21, 2018 at 9:43 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Amusing...If Only So Typical Minimalist 1 516 July 19, 2018 at 2:09 pm
Last Post: warmdecember
  Oh, The Unhappy Rich, White, Motherfuckers! Minimalist 4 971 July 1, 2018 at 3:18 pm
Last Post: brewer
  The only good waffle with a nude gun is a..... Brian37 27 5136 April 24, 2018 at 7:09 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Barbara Bush in failing health. Only recieving comfort care now. c172 14 2764 April 17, 2018 at 11:05 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  So Republicunts Are Only Against Abortion For Other People Minimalist 5 1427 April 13, 2018 at 8:25 pm
Last Post: Silver



Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)