(November 6, 2017 at 12:54 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(November 6, 2017 at 12:08 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Well, I would also be interested to read that, and like MK, I rigorously observe the right to privacy, so if you could go so far?....
I thought you already said it wasn't true anyway?
I read the bible cover to cover twice, and probably a dozen more times in drips and drabs. The Koran also.
I firmly believe that if one proposes to argue against any proposition whatever that might be, one has a duty to first understand said proposition.
Second, I was raised RCC in an RCC family, so I already have a head start.
And third, When I said I respect the right to privacy, I meant it. It might very well happen that I might want to post whatever part of you material. Were that to happen, I would do what? Three steps. 1. I disagree with this chunk of text. (with luck, a constructive private conversation ensues) 2. I state that whatever is worth posting to the thread, you may or may not agree. 3. You either grant or deny permission.
And there it ends. Sure, I can happily mock you all week long for things you post publicly were I of a mood to do so. Private communication falls under a very different ethical regime. Who knew, atheists actually do have ethics.
All that said, I know I am a new user on this site, and I know full well that you have no reason to know if I am real or some mad internet loon.
Bottom line? Say yes or say no. That is your call to make, and so it should be.
And no, I will not get humpy either way.