Let us go back to "cold" hard logic."Time"

[AFTT47]

Should I listen to you or theoretical physicists on the subject of theoretical physics?

That isn't the subject. That's the point. I agree with the science fully. I'm just drawing a distinction between what science studies and what science doesn't study.

Yes, Hammy, it sure as hell is the subject. I see what you're doing here. You're doing everything you can to weasel out of the fact that you have a conviction which flies in the face of what theoretical physicists have been saying for over 100 years. Rather than try to argue the physics, you have crafted an argument that physics doesn't matter. It's clever but it doesn't work. The problem with your argument is that you treat 4-D space-time as an entity that is floating out there on its own and than say, "see, science can't study this because we can't experience it." But 4-D space-time doesn't stand on its own. It is attached to general relativity - a theory which is very much falsifiable, very much in the realm of what science can study. There is no way to dis 4-D space-time without dissing general relativity.