Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 6, 2025, 11:52 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Still....well over 6,000 in either case!
#1
Still....well over 6,000 in either case!
http://apnews.excite.com/article/2011081...17C80.html

Quote:WASHINGTON (AP) - That old moon might not be as antique as we thought, some scientist think. They say it's possible that it isn't a day over 4.4 billion years old. But other astronomers disagree with a new study's conclusions. They think the moon is up to its typical age-defying tricks and is really pushing 4.6 billion as they have suspected all these years.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Still....well over 6,000 in either case! - by Minimalist - August 17, 2011 at 3:57 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  James Webb telescope is live (well, almost)! Jehanne 5 955 March 20, 2022 at 9:31 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  NASA: Asteroid Could Still Hit Earth in 2068 WinterHold 52 7670 November 7, 2020 at 2:42 pm
Last Post: WinterHold
  Banzai! Well done, Japan. Minimalist 7 1222 September 27, 2018 at 9:35 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  Are Scientists Still Looking for the Higgs Boson? Rhondazvous 24 9895 July 18, 2017 at 4:48 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Well the universe is dying... slowly... fucking entropy... dyresand 19 6045 September 14, 2015 at 12:48 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Well, fuck...may as well just kill ourselves! Minimalist 58 12625 February 17, 2015 at 11:56 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  God vs Big Bang- Are either correct? sswhateverlove 132 29768 September 15, 2014 at 1:59 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  Still think our place in the cosmos is special? Cyberman 1 1579 October 3, 2012 at 2:20 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Neutrinos still travel faster than light Welsh cake 46 19687 December 16, 2011 at 3:35 pm
Last Post: Pete
  Research shows radiometric dating still reliable (again) orogenicman 7 3601 November 16, 2010 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: orogenicman



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)