RE: White Guy Self-Identifies as Filipino Woman
November 22, 2017 at 8:23 pm
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2017 at 8:26 pm by CapnAwesome.)
(November 22, 2017 at 8:11 pm)Hammy Wrote:(November 22, 2017 at 1:42 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Sometimes I wonder if people are reading the same article that I am. A Huffington post blog article, whose main source is another blog, hardly constitutes evidence. When you dig through to the actual study, all it says is that transsexual women are perceived as more masculine than cis women. Gee why could that possibly be? It says nothing about what they are trying to express, which seems often to be a hyper-sexual femininity. Of course we can't know exactly how common that is, because it's not what the actual survey measures, despite what the Huffington post and the blog they link to suggest. They just bank on people being to lazy to sort through their super shotty citation method to actually check.
The article actually makes sense. And sure, you're unable to make sense of it, but that is hardly surprising considering that you can't even grasp a basic understanding of logical fallacies in a debate about anything at all.
That's an ad hominem. The articimakes sense because I'm too dumb to understand it? Nice logic skills. Defend it on it's own ground.
(November 22, 2017 at 8:19 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:(November 22, 2017 at 8:02 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: I actually did, click on the links. They go to a blog which cites a study that doesn't even say what the original says. I mean, do you think you are going to fool me by saying this or something? I just read it and went though the links .
Actually they do . Still waiting for those devastating studies that show gender essentialism is a thing . When were they 1970 . Who wrote them quack Jordan Peterson . Wait it does not matter because gender essentialism is as dead as behaviorism. It is not hard to fool a fool lucky you that's not my intent .
I broke down the links for you, where they go and what the study says in my other post. Not sure what you are talking about after that. I don't particularly care about this topic, I just want to make sure the science being cited and opinion being expressed meld well together, which they don't on this case.
![[Image: dcep7c.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i46.tinypic.com%2Fdcep7c.jpg)