(November 27, 2017 at 10:10 am)alpha male Wrote:(November 27, 2017 at 9:47 am)Grandizer Wrote: Doesn't matter.
If you assume a person is guilty on a single accusation, that's your choice. Most people take a little more.
I don't assume someone is guilty on the number of accusations only. I consider other factors as well, like how detailed the victim's report was, that this was reported to the police, and the nature of the response from the accused.
Quote:Quote:Is there a clear record stating that she hates his guts?
No, but it doesn't sound like that would change your mind anyway.
Oh, I'm open to any possibility. You want to change my mind? Bring me the details that conclusively or very likely show his innocence. What I'm seeing are indicators (red flags) showing the opposite.
Quote:Quote:Silence or a lazy attempt to deny the accusation is often a telling sign of guilt,
Stallone quickly issued a statement saying that the charge was "ridiculous" and "categorically false."
Exactly. That was it. Considering that this is a reputation-damaging accusation, if he is innocent, it is rather baffling he didn't even attempt to make a proper case for his innocence. Perhaps because he knows what he did and thinks it better to avoid the topic just in case he slips up and digs himself deeper into the hole.
