Views beyond Atheism

[Edwardo Piet]

Because I said no evidence AND - that includes Non-Empirical (NE as I say) evidence. It includes your 'reasoning ' too (I've said this before btw....sigh lol) - because if your reasoning WAS valid it would count as evidence of SOME form at least (i.e valid NE evidence).

So by no evidence I mean I know of no valid reasons AT ALL, both forms of evidence included, NE included as well I mean.

I know of no evidence whatsoever for such a complex being, and yet others go ahead believing it and I am still yet to know of ANY evidence whatsoever (NE included! 'reasoning' and 'reasons' too as I have explained).

So I find it to be ridiculous. I say all of this is certainly grounds for laughter (to me anyway), I have certainly thought it through.

I am not claiming to absolutely KNOW there is no God however, I just find the whole fact people go ahead believing it so silly because of how extremely improbable I believe he is.

So I'm not being ignorant or closed-off because I DO accept the possibility of being wrong. I believe it is possible just...not at all probable.

I do not know of your 'reasons' in any way counting of evidence of God actually existing...not reason to believe he actually exists therefore, not valid.

If they WERE valid reasons to actually believe he actually EXISTS then that WOULD count as valid evidence (if it was indeed true) - whether empirical or NON-empirical (and it would have to be NE really because we've already established, I think; that God is outside the 'empirical realm' although I currently know of no 'NE evidence' either of course).

EvF