RE: What would it take?
December 10, 2017 at 9:31 pm
(This post was last modified: December 10, 2017 at 9:39 pm by JairCrawford.)
(December 10, 2017 at 8:57 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote:(December 10, 2017 at 8:20 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: More than any other type of literature, the prophetic literature has never lent itself to a plain reading.
(December 10, 2017 at 8:43 pm)JairCrawford Wrote: But claiming to predict the second coming is ludicrous. It's in the red letters themselves that such a prophecy cannot happen.
Just out of curiosity, do you put more credence in the red letters than elsewhere in the NT?
Do you consider letters that were written by Paul to various churches to be the Word of God?
It just seems that the red letters alone ought to be considered so, if anything; it is a stretch to throw a bunch of letters from Paul into "the Word of God." Those are the words of Paul, aren't they? Is Paul God?
Well, yes and no. I believe the letters from Paul to be Inspired, and great spiritual meaning can be gained from them, but the red letters are directly from Jesus, so they are of a higher priority.
