What would it take?

[drfuzzy]

When you ask a question based on a specific cannon, then you for the sake of the argument at least suspend the right to call into question the validity of the cannon. Why? because you question asks for cannon to explain itself. when it does to back out of the question is intellectual dishonesty.

I know, right? Atheist questions about specific Christian doctrines are generally disingenuous. They can't see that it taints their brand.

What type of cannon?  Howitzer?  Mortar?  Most 10-year olds can spell better than Dripshit.  
It's very possible to ask a question about a section of religious canon if it is a contradiction with another section of the canon or contradicts known science -- particularly when some people actually think the canon is infallible -- in order to prove fallibility.  And since most people on an atheist forum know the Bible quite well and think it's a bunch of ridiculous fables, this type of query should be expected.