RE: What would it take?
December 11, 2017 at 5:03 pm
(This post was last modified: December 11, 2017 at 5:19 pm by Drich.)
(December 8, 2017 at 10:44 pm)Succubus Wrote:(December 8, 2017 at 11:15 am)Drich Wrote: ...When you ask a question based on a specific cannon, then you for the sake of the argument at least suspend the right to call into question the validity of the cannon. Why? because you question asks for cannon to explain itself. when it does to back out of the question is intellectual dishonesty...
Who wrote the cannon gospels?
The Holy Spirit wrote the gospels. What scribes did He use? we refer to the indivisual scribes as Matthew Mark Luke and John.
(December 9, 2017 at 4:41 am)Bow Before Zeus Wrote:(December 8, 2017 at 11:15 am)Drich Wrote: Moron..Oops... More personal attacks from xtians. I'm getting used to this now but please note, I have not responded in kind to any xtians that have personally attacked me.
Quote:You can't ask, "Would an elevator be able to go up if Thor's Hammer was set in the middle of it." Then when the answer is given you can't say there is no such thing as Mjölnir.
When you ask a question based on a specific cannon, then you for the sake of the argument at least suspend the right to call into question the validity of the cannon. Why? because you question asks for cannon to explain itself. when it does to back out of the question is intellectual dishonesty.
In this case God Came to each and every person that was issued those warring or originally received them (and everyone since then) within their own life time everyone has experienced that judgement.. So the urgency you see in genuine because before those people were cool in the ground they stood judgement before God.
Right, not sure what you are getting at here. You seem to be so angry that your text is muddled up and confused. Can you please calm down and make your point succinctly and clearly.
(December 8, 2017 at 1:30 pm)Aegon Wrote: You think Jesus reached nirvana or he's running around a meadow right now waiting for the farmer to milk him?
Ye, I think he is reborn and his name is Aegon.
Let's say...
You ask a question based in the star wars galaxy. Lets pretend you ask "what makes a light saber's lazer beam solid when struck by another light saber?" Then I give an answer in accordance to star wars cannon. "Kaber Crystals turn light energy into a controllable solid plasma. " You may then say "Science" says plasma is not a solid it is a meta physical state of matter that lives between energy and gas.
Now I am pointing out that is an intellectually lazy response on your part as when you ask a "star wars question" you have to preclude or accept the Star Wars cannon as the ultimate authority, inorder to even ask the question. Let alone receive an answer.
The same is true with your OP You asked a canonical based Question about the nature of God, and Got a canonical response. you then can't honestly side step the answer you got because it was based on cannon, BECAUSE YOUR F-ING QUESTION WAS ALSO BASED ON CANNON!!! IF you ask a cannon based question then by defaut you accept a canonical answer.
Hence me calling you a moron.
Not a personal attack, just a intellectual observation. You want to seem "smart" but default to logical fallacy to obtain your status which is the opposite of what you think you have obtained.
