RE: What would it take?
December 12, 2017 at 12:44 am
(This post was last modified: December 12, 2017 at 12:50 am by Neo-Scholastic.)
(December 11, 2017 at 10:00 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: I did some rather dubious number crunching there... my bad. I misread the chart, but still... over 30%
That's fine. I was only expressing my general impression. Do you believe that inerrancy is necessary for something to be authoritative? It seems like you do. I certainly don't think so. It depends on what you expect it to be authoritative about. I don't believe the Scriptures were written to convey cosmological or scientific facts; but rather, to reveal the nature of the Lord's sovereignty and serve as a reliable guide for Man's salvation. For those, I consider it authoritative, which, to my mind, is more than enough.