Views beyond Atheism

[Edwardo Piet]

I thought we'd agreed to swap 'reasoning' for 'NE evidence' since it's so easy to forget that this 'reasoning' if valid (as I have explained) would have to count as evidence of some form (because the word 'reasoning' is so ambiguous, so it's easy to forget that we are still actually in the realm of (NE) evidence here (as I have explained))

BECAUSE - if this 'reasoning' gave valid 'reasons' for believing that God ACTUALLY EXISTS then it WOULD count as evidence (NE included).

NE=non-empirical. I'm sick of saying non-empirical lol. Maybe I should just write it down on my windows sidebar and copy/paste it LOL.

EvF