(December 22, 2017 at 5:35 pm)Starhunter Wrote: I can give you my point of view, but it would be a tangent to the thread.
It's not your point of view I'm discussing; it's the factual basis for it and the claims you're presenting.
(December 22, 2017 at 5:35 pm)Starhunter Wrote: If Jesus was actually the Son of God as claimed, then wouldn't that be dripping with physics?
Would it? Okay, please tell us how "Jesus" explains "God's" 'miracles'.
(December 22, 2017 at 5:35 pm)Starhunter Wrote: What kind of physics would be convincing,
You want me to make your case for you? It doesn't work like that. You present what you have and I'll consider it. If I don't find it convincing, I'll explain why. Especially if this is the standard of evidence you're going with:
(December 22, 2017 at 5:35 pm)Starhunter Wrote: other than the fact that God "upholds all things" as the Bible puts it, causing a continuous existence of all material things by his power?
A personal interpretation of a cherry-picked quote from the claim =/= "fact".
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
