Why does science always upstage God?

[Huggy Bear]

Know why atheism has no burden of proof?

It's because atheism isn't trying to prove anything.

Then it's a good thing that my request for evidence had nothing to do with any god now, isn't it?

---

Take abiogenesis for example.

Life only comes from life, there is absolutely no evidence showing otherwise, if so then show me evidence of where non-life has produce life. If you can't then you make yourself a hypocrite by exercising faith in something for which no evidence exists.

How did god do it then?
What was the process it used?
Where did it get the materials?
Where is the evidence for any of the above?

You see, when you try to subject your silly notion to the same level of scrutiny you seem to want of science it falls apart instantly.

Oh and to prove that something did something you also need proof for that thing, got any?

See Stimbo, this is an example of irony...

First of all buddy, it is not a requirement of mine to have everything explained, I can accept that the supernatural exists... YOU'RE the one that has a problem acknowledging the supernatural.

Now how about you reconcile the questions you posed with abiogenesis and see just how ridiculous you sound.