(December 23, 2017 at 6:49 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(December 23, 2017 at 4:21 pm)Cyberman Wrote: That's rather a predictable way of saying no. Why should I have to demonstrate abiogenesis for you to be able to demonstrate the supernatural? Particularly when you know I don't chase herring?
What is it about 'faith' that you don't understand? I have repeatedly stated that proof is not a requirement for faith, so I don't need to demonstrate anything.
If a demonstration is necessary for YOU to believe the supernatural exists, then why isn't a demonstration required of something like abiogenesis?
See the hypocrisy?
A demonstration of Abiogenesis is required to believe that it is how life started. Nobody is saying Abiogenesis is absolutely how life began, so no faith is required, it's simply a hypothesis.
