RE: Why does science always upstage God?
December 23, 2017 at 8:59 pm
(This post was last modified: December 23, 2017 at 9:13 pm by Huggy Bear.)
I notice ignoramus would rather spend time handing out kudos than actually address anything I've asked him, what a coward.
You absolutely ARE saying that abiogenisis is how life began IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN A CREATOR! So unless you are of the opinion that life has always existed (which again there is no evidence of), then by eliminating the possibility that life had a creator, you accept abiogenesis (life from non-life) by default.
(December 23, 2017 at 7:07 pm)Mr.wizard Wrote:(December 23, 2017 at 6:49 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: What is it about 'faith' that you don't understand? I have repeatedly stated that proof is not a requirement for faith, so I don't need to demonstrate anything.
If a demonstration is necessary for YOU to believe the supernatural exists, then why isn't a demonstration required of something like abiogenesis?
See the hypocrisy?
A demonstration of Abiogenesis is required to believe that it is how life started. Nobody is saying Abiogenesis is absolutely how life began, so no faith is required, it's simply a hypothesis.
You absolutely ARE saying that abiogenisis is how life began IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN A CREATOR! So unless you are of the opinion that life has always existed (which again there is no evidence of), then by eliminating the possibility that life had a creator, you accept abiogenesis (life from non-life) by default.
