(December 28, 2017 at 7:15 am)ShirkahnW Wrote:(December 28, 2017 at 5:21 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: I don't agree; no.As I said there is a reason why I picked that sura. It is considered the last and therefore most important sura. And there is no verse in said sura i know of which advocates peace.
You are throwing me with stones, while your house is made out of glass. You share the same religious views with Dahmer and Stalin. But that doesn't make you a serial killer, or a mad dictator.
Your concept is not right.
Furthermore; the world's problems are produced from the immorality of steps and actions like the creation of atomic weapons and WMDs. Religion is not the main problem here; money and economy is.
No; it is.
Also the "linguistic" context. The meaning of the author is a must. Even in science and entertainment.
In my reply; I quoted to you the Quran itself. Not a history book, or a historical opinion. When put in the original context, the verse means something totally different than what you suggested.
What about the other verses that advocate peace?
and this?
And so many other verses?
Muslims weren't ordered to fight everybody. Instead they were ordered to fix the earth:
Choosing the verses of self-defense, and strip them off their context, is the same ignorant way Sunnies and Shiites invoke to justify their religions.
It's the same cherry-picking.
Quote:ShirkahnW Said:
The hiszorical context is irrelevant
