(January 3, 2018 at 11:47 am)Khemikal Wrote:(January 3, 2018 at 11:41 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I agree that it is wrong, so if you want to continue along these lines, it is a straw man.........................? I didn't ask you if you thought it was wrong.
I asked you whether or not you might be able to identify some harm done if I waltzed up behind you and grabbed your dick. I've asked you whether or not sexual assault is objectively harmful.
The harm is subjective, it's really going to depend on the person, and how they feel (subjective). The act in question is physically harming.
If the person feels harmed because you touched their shoulder, would you justify a similar reaction?
And no... if someone runs up and touches my dick, I'm not gong to assault them. I don't really feel harmed, and there is no objective harm done. Is there an objective difference if he had accidentally touched the boob vs purposely?
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
