(January 4, 2018 at 1:07 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(January 4, 2018 at 1:04 pm)paulpablo Wrote: Maybe if you misinterpret everything thats written there.
I said technically shed be at fault legally because of her physically assaulting the man and itwasnt in defence or for the purposes of detaining the man for the police.
That doesnt mean its her fault for being sexually assaulted. Her being at fault legally has nothing to do with the sexual assault.
I said she punches like a girl which is fair enough i did say that because she does.
I said her tits look bad to me but not that it should take anything away from the sexual assault.
No, no misinterpretation is needed. You check all the boxes, but because it's your opinion, you are unable to step outside yourself and see it from another perspective. Hardly surprising ... 'tis the human condition, to be wrapped up in one's own coccoon.
No i didnt say most of the things mentioned there, in some cases im actually saying the exact opposite.
The sexual assault was the mans fault, she was the victim of the sexual asaault. And neither of those things contradict what was in the original thing i posted
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
