(January 4, 2018 at 2:06 pm)Jane2d Wrote: I am going to guess most who have posted so far, 2 weeks ago couldn't give a flying F about what Bannon has to say. I could go as far as to say, most of you would have considered anything Bannon had to say would be the rantings of a mentally ill alcoholic. I would also wager iyho, anything breitbart has to say must be wrong cuz, well its breitbart.
And now it is different. Because it fits into your personal view of trump.
The first thing that went through my mind was NDA. I remember hearing many years ago ALL Trump employees sign such a papers and personally I would not work for such an employer. But Bannon did work for such an employer. Does this mean he didn't spout off? Nope. But where is the proof? From an author who for years has been questioned on accuracy:
Quote:Wolff says he has notes and e-mail that back him up, but refuses to release them.
https://web.archive.org/web/201207180615...burn.shtml
Bannon is a disgruntled former employee with character issues. I would not put a lot of stock in any words attributed to him now or before, just because its convenient for a narrative I may want to push forward.
I suppose that applies to the other 199 people that Wolff interviewed too, huh?
Personally, I love it when rats turn on each other. Which rat pack are you in?
